Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajput ganpal foundation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 01:39, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Rajput ganpal foundation

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested prod, reason was "no evidence of notability" which I concur with  Falcon8765  (T ALK ) 21:20, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as the editor who placed the prod. No evidence of WP:N. A Google search comes up with zero hits outside of WP. Apparition11  Complaints / Mistakes  21:40, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 8 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per above. Neutralitytalk 20:21, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Article on Rajput Ganpal Foundation is well written and quite true. I personally know about this Foundation and many hundred peoples in our country are beneficiary of this Foundation`s work. If you simply go to Google, you put the name of Rajput Ganpal Foundation or Rajput Ganpal, you will easily notice lot of evidences. Even you can phone or find their registeration certification on Governments website www.fbr.gov.pk and track there ( Liaqat Hussain or his CNIC number) with Rajpute Ganpal Foundation, and you will find their registeration certificate. If you need any proof, i can send you scanned email copy of their Registeration certificate too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sherryhome (talk • contribs) 12:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * To be considered notable by WP standards, the foundation needs to have had received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. I re-checked the Google search that I posted above, and while it gets more hits than it did when I posted it, they are mainly mirrors of this site. Can you provide some reliable, third party sources to establish notability? Apparition11  Complaints / Mistakes  15:37, 13 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as per WP:ORG. Furthermore, article is a complete garbled mess, unfocused, and vanity (3 pics of its founder!). -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:21, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.