Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raju Bhatt (Gujarat cricketer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:40, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Raju Bhatt (Gujarat cricketer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Was a declined PROD. No coverage found apart from 1 stats page showing that he played in a single match. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Also relevant is the recent discussion regarding WP:CRIN Roller26 (talk) 12:41, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 12:41, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 12:41, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 12:41, 28 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment - I forgot I'd even de-prodded this one. Blurg. Whatev's. I doubt I'll end up with any of my Ranji Trophy cricketer articles left on here, but you know. Achievement is achievement even when it is systematically destroyed. Bobo. 12:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge to List of Gujarat cricketers. Fails all notability standards other than NCRIC/CRIN which, as the nom alludes to, does not enjoy community support. Even if there were valid arguments that such cricketers (i.e. those with very few FC/LA appearances with no contributions of substance) are notable, there is entirely insufficient information to sustain a standalone article, and it is inconceivable that any substantial coverage can be found if any even exists (statistical databases such as Cricinfo & CricketArchive do not count). wjematherplease leave a message... 12:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete not enough substantive sources to justify the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.