Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raju Saravanan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  17:19, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Raju Saravanan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't appear to meet the notability requirements for a creative professional WP:DIRECTOR. Also the article creator has broken the rules by removing a speedy delete tag themselves and also moved from draft to article space without utilising the proper process. Ajf773 (talk) 23:14, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 23:14, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 23:14, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:40, 29 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Subject does not meet WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. The article creator obviously realizes this, since the article is basically "He has one directing credit and is the brother of" + copy-pasted contents from his brother's article about his brother's achievements + "and he has one directing credit". Coverage is passing mentions and non-RS. Bakazaka (talk) 20:30, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Boldly removed the text copy-pasted from his brother's article, as it could be misleading to a casual reader thinking that "he" and "his" refers to the article subject, rather than his brother. Bakazaka (talk) 01:54, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:34, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * delete this also seems like an attempt to push through one of several questionably notable subjects. Praxidicae (talk) 12:52, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. No individual notability. Article is trying to construct notability by proxy. Britishfinance (talk) 18:06, 11 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.