Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raju Sethi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  21:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Raju Sethi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Questionably notable and improvable as the best I found was this, this, this and this and despite the article saying the company is "the most successful South Asian television entertainment program in North America" but not having a current Wikipedia article questions its weight and depth and this current article has not changed much since starting in September 2007. SwisterTwister  talk  22:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete There's this source about the subject, but it doesn't appear that the claim of notability is supported by reliable sources. Alansohn (talk) 00:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I say delete because the article is one sentence long and the only source appears to be a primary source. It's not quite A1 under CSD but not far from it. There's a delete vote for you SwisterTwister. ;-) Not So Dumb Blond (talk) 02:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as searches turned up nothing to show it passes WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:25, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Person not notable as claimed. Page appears more to be promotional than encyclopedic in nature. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  17:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment. This page was previously deleted on 23 Apr 2006 also. Just FYI. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  17:02, 28 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.