Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raka dey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 01:30, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Raka dey

 * – ( View AfD View log )

naveenpf (talk) 06:24, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete violates just about every inclusion guideline going. Should have been speedied. Yunshui (talk) 10:32, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note I declined the speedy deletion nomination. There is a claim of being a published author, which means it should be discussed here instead. TN X Man  15:51, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 24 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete: Utterly non-notable. Fails WP:N big time. Even in Bangladeshi media / sources, the subject is not notable at all. (Please do note that "published author" means nothing, as it takes only about $100-120 to self-publish in Bangladesh or India (it may even be cheaper!!). So, anyone can have a book published via vanity press.) --Ragib (talk) 21:45, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.