Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rakel Liekki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  Sandstein  07:18, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Rakel Liekki

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Tagged with notability concerns for a couple of month. Possible failure of notability criteria with no references to prove claims of notability such as "she has been referred to as the apostle of porn". EuroPride (talk) 12:51, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 14:04, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 14:05, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable porn star, notable artist, notable writer. Prolog (talk) 17:49, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and remove any future tags toward notability concerns. The sourced notability as artist, journalist, and actress, even if only in Finnish sources, is notable enough for Wikipedia. Note: One of the nominator's concerns of she being referred to as ""she has been referred to as the apostle of porn." is actually in the article title "Rakel Liekki, Pornon apostoli" of the article at City.fi... hard to miss, and which indeed existed as a citation when this was nominated.   Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:56, 30 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep I agree, there are enough sources that confirm this person's notability. The links found seem to prove that.   D r e a m Focus  09:55, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.