Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rakhi Rashmi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. slakr \ talk / 06:35, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Rakhi Rashmi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Inadequate notability demonstrated for this barrister. References are brief mentions of subject or single quotes. Fails WP:BIO. red dog six (talk) 14:34, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep -- Article seems to confirm Rakhi Rashmi is a leader in her field. Geo Swan (talk) 20:39, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Passes neither WP:Prof or WP:GNG. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC).
 * Delete per WP:GNG, in the absence of reliably-published sources independent of the subject that cover her in-depth. I could be persuaded by articles about the cases she's worked on rather than about her personal life, since that's what she should be notable for, but the ones we have now don't say anything nontrivial about what she did, they just quote her. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete -- This feels like a case of self-promotion. Having a doctorate is unusal among lawyers, buit no doubt not unique.  Many barristers will hav a specialisation.  Without knowing more about the alleged publications, I cannot say whether they might make her notable.  Peterkingiron (talk) 19:33, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.