Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rakhmatilla Akhmadjonov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Rakhmatilla Akhmadjonov

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Rakhmatilla Akhmadjonov

Non-notable blogger. A biography of a living person should speak for itself and explain why the subject is biographically notable, which this article does not do, probably because the subject is a run-of-the-mill student and blogger. This article was already moved to draft space once and back to article space, so not moving to draft space again (except by consensus). This article says nothing about significant coverage by reliable sources. It reads like a social media profile, but Wikipedia is not a social medium. This article was written to praise its subject, but Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:54, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Internet,  and Uzbekistan. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:54, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete this promotional profile of a non notable individual. Mccapra (talk) 07:14, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete at speed. "He is one of the most educated, mature and young specialists in Uzbekistan." Lovely. Fails WP:GNG in spades. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:39, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is just a crosswiki spam (just deleted it from ru.wiki). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:11, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Source section is a hoax (Dom-2, followers, Fort Boyard). All sources are fake.—Iluvatar (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 06:16, 27 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.