Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rakin Anan Chowdhury


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. If you're concerned about this article being deleted, please bring it up at deletion review. SarahStierch (talk) 01:54, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Rakin Anan Chowdhury

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced, promotional biography of an apparently non-notable director. The sources used in the article are unreliable and I am unable to find any reliable sources independent of the subject. - MrX 20:10, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Zahidul009 (talk) 20:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC)With due respect, WIKIPEDIA is a non profit organization.And this page is not for promotion.We made this page with the heart's content.So,please think at least once about the work we've done every day to enrich WIKIPEDIA.I think the complainer should think about our hard work.Thank you allZahidul009 (talk) 20:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete This young man has not yet received significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, and therefore is not notable at this time. Yes, the article has an indisputably promotional tone, but that could be corrected if he was notable. But he isn't.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  20:56, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Promotional and not notable. Samwalton9 (talk) 21:08, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Not Bad,can be kept -And this page is not for promotion.We made this page with the heart's content.So,please think at least once about the work we've done every day to enrich WIKIPEDIA.We can edit it to be more reliable.Thanks Zahidul009 (talk) 06:37, 4 December 2013 (UTC)contribs) 21:35, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the effort you have put in to creating content on Wikipedia. Unfortunately though, content HAS to be notable to be included on this website. If this wasn't the case then the site would fill up with pages and pages on nothing important. If you can prove that the subject of this article is notable then it can be kept. Samwalton9 (talk) 21:38, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Good Article,Should be kept - It seems to me,The creator of this article corrected many errors and now it is quite reliable.References and links prove that the person featuring this article has some reputation.In Bangladesh, the film mentioned in this article has become famous.And definitely the producer of that film mentioned in the article, truly deserve a page in WIKIPEDIA. I hope all the respected users and members will consider this page and cancel the deleting process.Thank you all.Tanjeena (talk) 06:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Reply Hello . Please point to the significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. I just don't see it.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  06:43, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:18, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:18, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:18, 4 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Note - I suspect that Tanjeena may be a sockpuppet of Zahidul and have requested clarification here. Samwalton9 (talk) 11:41, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
 * As has been confirmed at the link above, Tanjeena has been confirmed as a sockpuppet account of Zahidul009. Samwalton9 (talk) 20:54, 4 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:BLP. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.