Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralgex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ due to a lack of participation following three relists. No prejudice towards immediate re-nomination. Daniel (talk) 09:36, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Ralgex

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Medical articles should have medically reliable citations - see Why%20MEDRS? Chidgk1 (talk) 07:23, 12 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 10:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 06:53, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Chidgk1 (talk) 07:23, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, I think that there is just enough coverage in reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. I've added some sources to the article. SailingInABathTub 🛁 17:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 09:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 * It's a borderline case. SailingInABathTub has got us sources for a list of ingredients, and I couldn't find sources for anything more than that, either; with most saying a lot less.  This puts us in borderline not-a-directory territory, as this is, literally given the sources that I found which were product catalogues (ISBN 9780747559283 being an A–Z catalogue of drugs that can be bought in stores, for example), product catalogue stuff more than it is encyclopaedia stuff.  Uncle G (talk) 11:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.