Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Craven


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 01:53, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Ralph Craven

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable person, fails WP:BLPNOTE ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   00:42, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and fails to state a reason why notability should be presumed in lieu of sources under WP:ANYBIO.  Googling turned up nothing useful, not even on Google scholar, where I expected I might find some papers that had been cited, given that the subject is a PhD.  I agree with nom.  This individual may be a very good at what he does but that has not made him notable.  Msnicki (talk) 03:16, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * delete fails WP:BIO. Simply being a board member doesn't add to notability. LibStar (talk) 07:51, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO. As always, this isn't a negative comment on the subject of the article, just an acknowledgement that they don't stand out as far as Wikipedia's notability guidelines go.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 08:31, 10 March 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.