Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Eckardt (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Valley2 city ‽ 02:53, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Ralph Eckardt
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Recreation of a previously deleted page, still no indication of notability. The article is essentially a resume for Mr. Eckardt. I can't see the previously-deleted article to compare, but there's no indication of notability here, other than a listing in a top-250 list of an industry website. The same editor apparently also had attempted to recreate Mark Blaxill, another associated page that had also been deleted. TJRC (talk) 23:45, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Can we not speedy delete this one?--Elen of the Roads (talk) 00:24, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I did try that first, but it was declined. TJRC (talk) 00:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:12, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The most notable thing is his book--but only 74 libraries have a copy, according to worldCat. Not a notable author, and probably not for anything else either. Blaxill, similarly. DGG (talk) 02:25, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Alefbe (talk) 13:31, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Speedy shouldn't have been declined. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:34, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.