Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph H. Kilmann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 05:55, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Ralph H. Kilmann

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 10:44, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Authors. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk !  10:44, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to pass either PROF or AUHTOR, this review: and this discussion from Harvard . Oaktree b (talk) 14:26, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep has published multiple books which have been reviewed, published journal articles, among other work so definitely meets author. More reviews:, , , , , review by the LA Times . And frequent mentions/interviews in newspaper articles. Skynxnex (talk) 19:23, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: per above additional sourcing. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:04, 6 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.