Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Mercier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 08:23, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Ralph Mercier

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Biography of a municipal-level politician, not properly demonstrated as the subject of enough significant reliable source coverage to clear WP:NPOL #2. Neither of his notability claims (mayor of a small suburban town, and then city councillor in the larger city it was amalgamated into) are automatic notability freebies -- Charlesbourg was not large enough to deem its mayors "inherently" notable, and Quebec City is not in the rarefied tier of major international "global cities" where city councillors are "inherently" notable either. So he does not automatically qualify for a Wikipedia article just because it's possible to verify that he existed -- at this level of significance, the notability bar he would have to clear is that he could be referenced to a depth and range and volume of coverage that marks him out as much more special than the norm, by virtue of expanding significantly above and beyond just the bare minimum that every municipal politician everywhere could always show. But the referencing here consists of a primary source that is not support for notability at all and five hits of purely local coverage in the local media, of which one is a very short blurb, one is a dead link and two are just routine obituaries. This is not enough coverage to make him more notable than the norm for this level of political office. Bearcat (talk) 22:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 22:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 22:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 12:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete seems to fail WP:NPOL and GNG. The town is big enough for some mayors to keep an article, but there should be more coverage in this case. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 06:35, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The person held a major position in a renowned city from 1984 to 2001. There must be some references in offline sources. Gritmem (talk) 08:29, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Charlesbourg is not a "renowned" city — and the office he did hold in a "renowned" city is not one that confers an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL just because local coverage probably existed in their local media, because every city councillor in every city always has local coverage in their own local media. City councillors become notable if they have nationalizing coverage beyond just their own local media, and are not automatically notable just because they existed. Bearcat (talk) 19:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: No keeps, but some have suggested sources could exist for the nearly-two decades mayor of a modestly-sized city. Besides WP:ROUTINE has already been shown last year not to apply to people.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ミラP 16:27, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. In addition to expected articles in Quebec about his time as mayor, there were articles about his 2008 trip to France to trace his ancestors that made national news in Canada, including Ottawa, Edmonton and Vancouver; that doesn't happen if you're not notable. Plus who knows how much TV coverage he got. —МандичкаYO 😜 17:45, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
 * None of this "trip to France to trace his ancestors" coverage has been shown, either in the article or in this discussion — so I searched in a database, and what I found was not articles about him, but articles which just included him giving brief soundbites to journalists whose core subject was the general concept of French Canadian genealogy, not specifically his genealogy. People are not notable just because they get quoted in articles about other subjects. Bearcat (talk) 19:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
 * He's front in center in the article and it adds to his notability., . Not to mention the likelihood of considerable French-language coverage. Have you even checked French-language sources? —МандичкаYO 😜 15:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per Nazmus Shakib. 24.80.117.27 (talk) 22:32, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment. I do think it is likely that French language print sources from his extensive time as mayor of a large suburb of Quebec City would probably put him over the threshold at WP:NPOL. In order to do that, one would need to access the newspaper archives from that time period. Does anyone have access to those?4meter4 (talk) 15:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Every mayor of everywhere always has or had some local coverage in their local media by definition, so just showing that some such coverage existed is not automatically enough to get a mayor over WP:GNG in and of itself. Bearcat (talk) 20:56, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Its sources the keep side needs not assertions.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 23:10, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep had significant political career with coverages from multiple sources. KartikeyaS  (talk) 07:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.