Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Sall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 22:36, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Ralph Sall

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Still questionable overall and my searches are only finding expected links at Books, News and Highbeam. SwisterTwister  talk  05:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)


 * in looking beyond "present state":


 * Keep per meeting WP:ANYBIO AND WP:CREATIVE and tag it for improvements. The man won a Razzie and has received nominations for an HFCS Award and an OFTA Film Award to meet WP:ANYBIO. Many sources are available for improvements as such coverage of he and his works meets WP:CREATIVE through such as Song Writer Universe, Billboard, Rollling Stone, Blabbermout, and many more Wow, you found the "expected links at Books, News and Highbeam" but apparently ignored WP:NRVE and WP:NEXIST which tell us that notability is found through existing sources, and NOT in their use in an article. And remember, sources do not have to be "only" about this man as long as they speak about he or his work directly and in detail. This is a matter for regular editing, not deletion. And as AFD is not the place to force it being done, care to withdraw your nomination and simply tag the article for work? Thanks.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 21:11, 9 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep I'm a bit troubled by this article lacking sources to back up claims, but my independent searches beyond this article finds verification of notability. ShelbyMarion (talk) 13:19, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep The notices asking for better references are pretty old, but still, I don't think we should delete the article as long as those references are available, which they seem to be.RockyMtChai (talk) 19:55, 13 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.