Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raluca Răducanu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 18:38, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Raluca Răducanu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seams like non-wp:notable person. I can't locate reliable sources with significant coverage. There are other people with the same name, so it's a bit hard to search for her.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:48, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete : per nom. Doesn't satisfy WP:GNG.  Links are to the subject's own website, what appears to be a teacher's blog, and two YouTube videos of the subject.  The article may also have a WP:COI issue, as well. Jip Orlando (talk) 20:36, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: It is Exaggerated insinuation. To say, in ones eyes, that someone is not so important still, it is ok, but to say advertising for oneself is too much, there are enough poster, wish shows her work Lulanep 17:28, 7 May 2017 (UTC)</
 * Draftify: Worth giving the editor a shot at satisfying GNG before removing. It currently is not notable but perhaps there is something out there that establishes that fact.  Jip Orlando (talk) 16:31, 6 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep : This article was created in article space on May 5, 2017, and sent to AfD less than 7 hours later by . Article creator  then moved it to Draft space about 90 minutes later.  Jip Orlando's above delete vote was added to the AfD before the moved to draft space.   then converted the AfD to an MfD.  So, I think it is important to ask Vanjagenije and Jip whether their views are unchanged for this one-day-old article now in draft space.  It is a BLP but I see nothing in the content that is problematic from a policy perspective.  The content is unreferenced but asserts reasons to think there could be notability as she has recordings as a musician and has received awards.  I think deleting it from draft space so soon would be WP:BITEy, and the article should be left for Lulanep to further develop, as that is the purpose of draft space.  It was not ready for article space, but draftifying has addressed that problem.  EdChem (talk) 02:07, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Draftify: Comment added after with below comment from, who has moved the article back to article space and turned this back into an AfD.  I believe draftifying is the appropriate outcome, and so, I am changing my vote from keep to draftify.  Geoffrey, keeping a non-ready draft in article space for the length of the AfD and having it visible to search engines (drafts are noindexed automatically) strikes me as absurd, especially when draftifying is a valid and sensible outcome and it was moved by the article creator who is clearly an inexperienced Wikipedia editor.  EdChem (talk) 02:18, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't think it is appropriate to move to draft during AfD, so I have moved the draft back to the article namespace and MfD back to AfD. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:15, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Draftify:I think, if no one is against, I would prefer to move it again as a draft. She may not seem for everybody so important still now, but I think, there are more possibilities. In my eyes, she has reached more things than others, who have an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lulanep (talk • contribs) 07:15, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.