Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ram Karmabhoomi (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Adam's Bridge. SpinningSpark 16:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Ram Karmabhoomi
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable, highly POV, and not at all an encyclopedic topic. Clearly violates What_Wikipedia_is_not. I had previously turned this article into a redirect, but an editor disagreed with that, so bringing to AfD for community decision. Jayakumar RG (talk) 06:09, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Please close this second nomination, as it was opened accidentally, due to network issues. Jayakumar RG (talk) 06:12, 20 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The page links direct here and so I've closed the first AFD in favour of this one. If it is kept and nominated again a second, second nomination might cause problems.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 08:46, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:01, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 13:18, 20 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect Very notable geological feature if talking only about the chain of shoals between Sri Lanka and mainland India, in English known as Adam's Bridge. Change to redirect to the Adam's Bridge article for those who look up "Ram Karmabhoomi" when they see this in one of the blogs/news entries on this pressure group. The term "Ram Karmabhoomi" seems only connected to a pressure group which is opposed to the creation of a shipping channel cutting through these shoals. The name does not seem to be used for the region at all apart from the pressure group. - Takeaway (talk) 13:43, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a WP:neologism, not supported by secondary RS or Hindu epics as a distinct technical term.-- Redtigerxyz Talk 15:25, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect Of course it is a new term, but it is shares relation with Adam's Bridge. Bladesmulti (talk) 03:35, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Don't see any sources for the term. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:45, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:50, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔   04:05, 4 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge and Redirect to Adam's Bridge — I have not background or context here but the article sure sounds like it's referring to Adam's Bridge. To the extent that this is talked about in press and such, we should explain the term but do so in another article if this is not common enough that to deserve it's own article. — m a k o ๛  22:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.