Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RamaHanuKwanzMas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-28 14:28Z 

RamaHanuKwanzMas


Yet another variant of that tired old theme that so many people seem to think is soooo funny. Well, grinch that I am, I don't see this belonging here, even though this one has the backing of a radio host - and not many other people, judging by the slightly-shy-of-500 non WP ghits it has garnered in the three years since the word was coined. That's a delete, BTW. Grutness...wha?  12:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this protologism. Guy (Help!) 12:25, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable religious innovation that won't get anywhere. Down the /dev/null with it. Anthony Appleyard 12:34, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete bah humbug. Danny Lilithborne 12:45, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - nn neologism. MER-C 13:28, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NFT made up on radio shows one day. Demiurge 13:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:NEO and lack of notability. Jayden54 17:06, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Ridiculous, nn Bwithh 20:49, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, WP:SNOW. &mdash; coe l acan t a lk  &mdash; 23:18, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NEO, WP:NFT, NN, and not even funny. Bah humbug. skrshawk 01:37, 25 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.