Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramanath payyade college of hotel management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I would be happy to userfy to an established editor in good standing who wishes to repurpose the page J04n(talk page) 19:45, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Ramanath payyade college of hotel management

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject fails general notability criteria. An online search provides no mention in reliable sources.

Possibly a case of paid editing (creator is "Marketing Wire"). — usernamekiran (talk)  05:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. WeAreAll Here  talk  06:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. WeAreAll</b> Here  <sub style="color:blue">talk  06:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The parent organization Bunts Sangha appears to be notable. This, one of many, eduxations institutions it established has not received subatantial coverage. I would rework to fix but unfortunately dping so contravenes deletion discussion rules. FloridaArmy (talk) 07:45, 23 April 2018 (UTC)


 * - what do you mean reworking it would contravene the deletion discussion rules? What's preventing you from improving the article? Nosebagbear (talk) 09:04, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, I mean I am not allowed to change the article subject during a deletion discussion. This would entail moving the article. I suppose perhaps it could be reworked without moving it but I'm not sure if someone would object. And it wpuld be weird to have an article about the parent organization at a title for one of its subordinate institutions. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah I hadn't realised you meant to move the article - yes I see your point. Nosebagbear (talk)
 * I fixed the name for the college in the header and infobox in the meantime. This can be renamed to such after AFD concludes if it still survives. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:24, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment:, you can create Bunts Sangha to act as a merge target. If you need to copy text over, just remember to add attribution.
 * Comment - Firstly, "a socio-cultural organization of Bunt Community of Mumbai and endeavors to promote Socio-economic, cultural and educational aspects of its members"...well I wouldn't say the intro paragraph is an example of crystal clear clarity. There's currently (well there always is) a dispute over schools that don't meet notability grounds, however I can't imagine this college, as-is, would survive in any case. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: idk how the education system in other countries work, but here it is a business, and a dirty one. The private colleges take money in 3-4 forms from the students. First is "unofficial donation" (off the records/black momey), for admission; the second is on record donation; the third is annual fees, which is different for merit list students, and students from management quota. Thats why such promotional articles about Indian educational institutions offend me. This article seems to be promotional/advertisement for that business installation. I also doubt the parent organisation Bunts Sangha is notable enough. In any case, notability is not inherited. — <span class="monospaced" style="font-family: monospace, monospace;">usernamekiran (talk)   21:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect and create Bunts Sangha as it owns a number of colleges  that don't seem to be notable on their own but as listed in the organization it would be informative.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:23, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Repurpose as an article on the parent chain, Bunts Sangha DGG ( talk ) 07:37, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment I wouldn't be reticent about voting merge if Bunts Sangha existed as an article, but just dropping this in, even with some basic trimming, wouldn't do it. The new article would be at risk of deletion as well which is both poor and cruel. It either needs some pre-filling or a keen, praiseworthy, person saying they'll deal with it when it shifts. Nosebagbear (talk) 08:28, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh 666 21:20, 2 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.