Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:17, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

DELETE - Not notable. No need for separate article. Either it should be deleted or it should be merged with Coimbatore page. This page does not serve any purpose. -- Bharathiya 02:26, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment large neighborhoods are generally kept, but smaller areas in my opinion should be deleted. Do we have any idea of the population? Bearian (talk) 18:10, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree. But this is neither a large neighborhood nor an highly important area. It is just an another urban area within the city of Coimbatore. Not notable for wiki in any manner. Even there is not even a single reliable reference, anywhere.--Bharathiya (talk) 18:51, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I found only 12 news Ghits but many Book Ghits. I am still not sure what to make of this one. Bearian (talk) 21:26, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * This page can be deleted as this page does not seem to be containing any important information. --Bharathiya (talk) 08:11, 20 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Can anyone let me know which policy obstructs from creating a location based stub article?? -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 18:11, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep I thought Wikipedia talks about notability and not importance.Here are a few links from The Hindu. 12 3 4 (Not too certain about the last one). I don't mind cleaning up the article. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:57, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Coimbatore; as just a neighbourhood/urban area it's best covered in the city article. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:06, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  →TSU tp* 11:00, 25 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Let me tell you [The Bushranger], every neighborhood of Mumbai has a Wikipedia article. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 17:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFF may exist, but that doesnt' mean this, or them, should. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:55, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * With HighBeam Research account, the website threw some 18 sources for me. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 17:39, 25 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep as evidences for notability has been mentioned by User:Rsrikanth05 - Anbu121 ( talk me ) 19:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment, I found one more on ToI: here. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Could someone actually add the sources found, so that we could evaluate the results better? Bearian (talk) 00:48, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I would if the article is kept. I see no point in adding sources to something that is going to be deleted. You can use the links provided for 'evaluation' as of now. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:12, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.