Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramaz Abesadze


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:25, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Ramaz Abesadze

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Page concerns a Georgian academic. Previously nominated for speedy and prodded, but retained both times. One editor suggested AfD which is why I have brought it here. The article as it stands is no more than a directory entry and there is no indication that this person is properly notable. A Google search (admittedly, in English) brings up Facebook and the like and the link provided in the article, which is to the institution in which he works and which does mention him a few times, but again, to my untrained eye, without demonstrating sufficient notability. I confess freely that I am not in a position to have expert knowledge on the notability or otherwsie of Georgian academics, but I hope others are. Emeraude (talk) 09:32, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:27, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:27, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:27, 27 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Tiny cites in GS. No evidence of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:30, 27 September 2013 (UTC).
 * Delete as per Emeraude. No evidence of notability. -- Inland mamba   (fruitful thought) 17:35, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Fails WP:Academic by far.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 13:45, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.