Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramcharan Bharali (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:45, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Ramcharan Bharali
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV   scope_creep Talk  15:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment I am always slightly reluctant to directly vote delete since I feel there can be local regional sources that could prove notability. So if someone who can read Assamese and find more, will be valuable. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * That is more or less the same argument that was given the last time and nothing was provided.   scope_creep Talk  22:24, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:36, 30 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:47, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. None of the sources in the article provide Bharali with any sort of significant coverage, and my searches (including in Assamese, which Google Translate seems to understand reasonably well) find only more trivial mentions. The GNG thus isn't met, and I don't see how any relevant SNG could be satisfied: the awards mentioned are not the sort of "well-known and significant" ones that could qualify under WP:ANYBIO #1, and the WP:NARTIST/WP:NACTOR criteria aren't met either. While I'm certainly willing to reëvaluate if additional sourcing can be identified, the fact that nothing has come to light in the aggregated 10 weeks that this article has spent at AfD leads me to think that there's nothing to be found. (On that note, I hope closers will consider !voting instead of closing: we really ought to avoid having three "no consensus, no quorum" closures in a row if at all possible.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above thanks for your work looking at that Extraordinary Writ - nothing to show notability here. Deathlibrarian (talk) 22:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, I couldn't find sufficient sources to show notability. Suonii180 (talk) 12:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: agreed, not notable. - Ret.Prof (talk) 21:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.