Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramesh K. Agarwal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (Non-administrator closure) Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:31, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Ramesh K. Agarwal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable person. Article reads like a resume. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:57, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep He meets WP:ACADEMIC criteria #5 as the holder of a named chair at a major university. Improve through normal editing. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  02:10, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Yes, holders of named chairs at major universities are generally considered to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:14, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:14, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:14, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:14, 4 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. As well as the named chair, his faculty profile indicates a many-times-over pass of #C3 as a fellow of multiple societies (among which at least AAAS and IEEE are good enough for a pass). —David Eppstein (talk) 19:54, 4 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep • The article meets WP:ACADEMIC.  C ute st Penguin Hangout 14:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep. The very first sentence of the lede indicates he holds a named professorship, which precisely satisfies WP:PROF c5. Would be good form for nom to withdraw this one to save time of other commentators. Thanks! Agricola44 (talk) 16:29, 5 September 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.