Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramesses (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 (talk) 16:27, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Ramesses (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NMUSIC. Has 1 not user generated source, which is a listing of songs with promotional text. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  14:01, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep have added a reliable source Allmusic bio and album review which normally indicates that more rs exists, will search later, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 17:07, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nomination makes no coherent case for lack of notability and is just concerned with article quality (which in terms of current sourcing is admittedly poor). In addition to the Allmusic coverage, there's, , , , , , and no doubt the usual coverage in metal magazines that can't be found online. --Michig (talk) 08:15, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:59, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:59, 23 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep - Just to pile on the same reasoning, this band has plenty of sources to demonstrate notability, easily found by the voters above. The nominator is advised to become familiar with WP:BEFORE and WP:NEXIST. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 17:37, 25 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.