Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramhorn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 07:30, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Ramhorn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This character does not establish notability independent of Transformers through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 16:42, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 6 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete and turn into a disambiguation page. Apparently, two characters by this name existed: a Predacon (which could be redirected to List of Predacons) and an Autobot (which could be redirected to List of Autobots).  One solution is to delete this page and create a disambiguation page at this title.  Another solution is to simply turn this into a disambiguation page without deleting it.  A third solution would be to pick one character (Autobot or Predacon) and redirect to the appropriate list.  I favor deletion and disambiguation, as it reduces the risk that the page will be reverted/recreated. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:00, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, I forgot the most obvious solution: pure deletion with no redirects or disambiguation. That'd be fine, too, but I think a courtesy redirect/disambiguation might be useful for fans. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:02, 6 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Yep...and turn into a disambiguation page. Deathlibrarian (talk) 23:20, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 10:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 19:08, 24 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - Article has notable citations. Mathewignash (talk) 01:45, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete no significant coverage in multiple reliable sources.Folken de Fanel (talk) 12:23, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.