Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rami Amer Dabbas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 14:42, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Rami Amer Dabbas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability. Only one of the sources is substantially about him, and that is just a report of one incident, in a doubtfully significant source. I think the article arguably qualifies for speedy deletion under criterion A7, but it has previously been deleted twice, once under A7 and once via PROD, so I thought it better to enable it to be discussed. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:48, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. That the user has previously attempted to create an autobiography (and not done anything useful on wp) means we should be getting harder on them, not softer. DexDor(talk) 19:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete given that there are media articles about this person I don't think A7 would be appropriate, but the available third-party sources are basically limited to some coverage of threats to kill him, which hardly gets past WP:NOTNEWS.  Hut 8.5  21:55, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as simply nothing actually convincing, including minimally, for keeping with the applicable notability and improvements. SwisterTwister   talk  05:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Sources not adequate.Xxanthippe (talk) 05:39, 14 May 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete per nom. --Dcirovic (talk) 14:21, 15 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.