Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rami Zeedan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 05:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Rami Zeedan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to meet WP:PROF or the WP:GNG. Very low citations according to GScholar, and still a postdoc so the rest of the PROF criteria seem unlikely. Google and GNews searches similarly turn up nothing of substance. None of the sources cited in the article are independent of the subject. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 23:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 23:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 23:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 23:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Only 3 cites in GS. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete as unconvincing, only things close to significance are mere fellowships. SwisterTwister   talk  00:24, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet WP:GNG. Autobiographical article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Very far from WP:PROF and no other notability evident. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete While I disagree with the nom on the post-doc thing (post-doc's can very well be professors), but the overall argument is spot on. The subject does not meet PROF. Lourdes  10:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.