Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramil Sheriff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 11:32, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Ramil Sheriff

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by an IP without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:32, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:32, 28 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 12:50, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Maybe later, but right now he fails WP:NFOOTBALL spectacularly. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:42, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per GNG. Tiggerjay (talk) 00:31, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, as stated above. Govvy (talk) 15:27, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:23, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:24, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:24, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete or possibly redirect to his club, if he is mentioned in a club-related article. If he goes on to pursue a senior career, he may become notable, but he seems NN as yet.  Peterkingiron (talk) 09:56, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet WP:NFOOTBALL and no other WP:SIGCOV. Mkdw talk 11:14, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.