Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramin Farahmandpur (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and a BLP subject that does not clearly meet notability guidelines. Cool Hand Luke 19:03, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Ramin Farahmandpur
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD, previously deleted in 2007 and re-created, does not appear to meet guidelines in Notability (academics) Wtshymanski (talk) 20:49, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Edison (talk) 21:01, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * week Keep He has published a good deal since 2007. is earlier book was reviewed in Educational Studies (American Educational Studies Association) v. 40 no. 2 (Oct. 2006). and in Teaching Education (Columbia, S.C.) v. 17 no. 4 (Dec. 2006), & is in over 200 libraries. Now checking articles.    DGG ( talk ) 23:14, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep with a GS h index of 12 in a low cited field. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:07, 21 April 2011 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete :Poorly written, lacking notability as an academic. Lack of references. Claims to his publishing history since 2007 are not grounds for keeping an Academic stub sans citations and references. --Whiteguru (talk) 00:20, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - The article does not seem to conform to WP:BIO. -Porchcrop (talk 09:19, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's a self-promotional bio that doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:PROF.  Nipson anomhmata   (Talk) 16:34, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:22, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.