Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramina Torabi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:25, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Ramina Torabi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A version of this article was sent to draft at Draft:Ramina Torabi as it was a BLP with 20 fake references, all of which led to wiki websites that never existed. The creator has trimmed this down to 12 references, all of which are still fake wiki websites that never existed. The external links are both genuine but neither establish WP:GNG or WP:NMODEL, I am concerned about Lilit as they state their intention is to promote the artists that they feature.

I have searched "رامینا ترابی" as part of a WP:BEFORE but can't find any WP:RS showing clear significant coverage. A lot of the articles are either just passing mentions or simply regurgitating her Instagram pictures or user-generated content.

This may well be eligible for WP:G5 speedy deletion soon as an active CU request has been opened at SPI, which is heavily backlogged. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:00, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:00, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:00, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:00, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:00, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

* Comment : I have created all the sources. Therefore, I request that the page be created and the tag be removed. I will also add 20 new sources.E B R A M (talk) 05:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC) Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:52, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment I also failed to find any working citations. (I was doing basic research to fix minor errors in what is now the draft, having assumed that the article was wanted.) Certes (talk) 20:06, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete As per nom. No indication of notability. References fail to establish notability of the subject. DMySon (talk) 01:51, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Source analysis - wow, that's an hour of my life that I wish I could claim back... Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:52, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Per User:Spiderone's table. Furius (talk)
 * Delete per Spiderone's extensive list as there's no evidence of GNG and while COI editing isn't prohibited, this comment from the creator that they "created the sources" and want help registering the page leads me to believe we're just here for their promotional purposes. Star   Mississippi  13:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

*Comment However, I got all the sources right. Therefore, in my opinion, according to the comments on the page, it should be revived. And remove the label. thanks all.E B R A M (talk) 14:40, 17 August 2021 (UTC) *keep .I fixed all the sources that had problems.E B R A M (talk) 14:50, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * if the discussion ends in keeping this article, the tag will be removed. Not before. Please disclose any necessary conflicts of interest Star   Mississippi  00:13, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per the source assessment table by Spiderone; the recent additions of statements describing a source as a news outlet, e.g., , , does not improve compliance with the WP:RS guideline. Beccaynr (talk) 16:34, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Spiderone's table. Spam article, pretty clear cut. – Broccoli &#38; Coffee  (Oh hai) 18:10, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete speedy delete Mardetanha (talk) 14:57, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails GNG. Potentially speedy delete under G5 but this has been open for a while so can be just a deletion.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 07:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.