Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramiro Torres


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:01, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Ramiro Torres

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable local AM DJ, fails the GNG and WP:ENTERTAINER. Article has been BLP tagged for seven years following a removed prod. Just took out a bunch of unsourced WP:PEACOCK violations and outright trivia, and when the dust settled, there's damn near nothing supported by a reliable source (and, as to that, no reliable sources). Just a paltry handful of news hits, all which are routine casual mentions, even under "Freakin' Puerto Rican," a moniker Torres used to use but apparently doesn't now. The article's history has it being created and worked over by a small horde of SPAs. No doubt the subject is a swell fellow, but his Wikipedia fan club notwithstanding, he just doesn't meet the standards for a biographical article.   Ravenswing   05:04, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 23:16, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 23:16, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 00:41, 29 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 00:13, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete local media personality with no broad-ranging coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree and my searches found nothing convincingly good with the best being this. SwisterTwister   talk  06:37, 9 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.