Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramius Corporation (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:55, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Ramius Corporation
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable corp. Found only a few gnews hits, and it was unclear if they even applied to this particular Ramius (they seemed to be biomed or financial). Certainly this article doesn't assert notability. If it was new and didn't have a previous afd I'd be inclined to A7. Also tagged for primary sources since 2008(!). Syrthiss (talk) 12:32, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. 16:24, 13 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 13 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TheSpecialUser TSU 00:46, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:24, 27 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete It gets a few mentions in trade publications, but I couldn't find enough independent coverage to meet WP:CORP. --MelanieN (talk) 22:31, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.