Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramkhamhaeng-Thonglor Monorail


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Four relists is excessive--if this had been prodded it would have been deleted three weeks ago. No prejudice to re-creation should this actually develop. Mackensen (talk) 14:27, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Ramkhamhaeng-Thonglor Monorail

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Like others of its kind, proposals such as this monorail system have too little set in stone to be regarded as verifiable. The system itself, if actually built, may be notable but it is WP:too soon for that. While the existence of the proposal may be verified by news reports, I have not been able to locate any updates newer than two years. I believe the lack of progress as well as any significant in-depth coverage signifies that this project does not deserve an article... yet. Paul_012 (talk) 07:24, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:55, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:55, 25 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 10:34, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 12:53, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete per nom and WP:HAMMER. Bearian (talk) 21:44, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  01:09, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theo polisme  02:33, 22 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.