Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramon Sean Rivas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  07:58, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Ramon Sean Rivas
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Hello. This article is borderline WP:CSD A7 and WP:CSD G4 as Ramon Rivas (audio engineer) was deleted on 25 February 2017 following Articles for deletion/Ramon Rivas (audio engineer). Ramon Rivas is much certainly a gifted professional working in the shadows of giants, but neither the article content nor its sources show any sign of notability. To be clear I have not done much WP:BEFORE. Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 09:25, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:47, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:47, 17 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: As the creator of this article, I would have to agree that the article does borderline on general notability, but no independent reliable sources exist covering the subject in detail. So for the time being, it does not need its own article space. NaturalSelection (talk) 14:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: The subject does have independent sources. The creator of this article was only focused on engineering and excluded the subject as a hip hop recording artist and record producer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by User: (talk • contribs)
 * Delete. The sources are all first-party, non-WP:RS, and/or passing mentions.  -- RoySmith (talk) 15:18, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete fails the GNG. L3X1 (distænt write)   )evidence(  19:20, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - agree with the nom's rationale, as well as searches not turning up enough in-depth coverage to show they meet WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:52, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, per RoySmith, my assessment of the sources is the same. —  InsertCleverPhraseHere  07:50, 26 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.