Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramsetcube


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Delete per G7 (User blanked the page). Given the previous deletions, I am also protecting the article from recreation. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 02:05, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Ramsetcube

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article was twice tagged CSD G11 (blatant advertising) and twice speedily deleted. The article creator strongly disagrees with this outcome so I am running it through here for input from other editors. Fails WP:CORP (software product). Gwen Gale (talk) 17:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Article shows no evidence of notability of product. Thetrick (talk) 20:10, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. SImple db-context: "an OLAP tool used to create metadata in Mondrian" is gobbledegook. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 09:43, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong delete and salt. I agree that it seems like advertising for a non-notable corporation. Ohconfucius (talk) 04:47, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep it it seems like... But this persons are expert of BI ?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergio Bertele (talk • contribs) 23:48, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment The above editor created the article. Gwen Gale (talk) 23:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment I believe this now qualifies as for WP:CSD, as its contents have been largely blanked by the original author, with message "Deleted by people without BI culture !". Ohconfucius (talk) 01:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.