Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramzan Ali


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JohnCD (talk) 20:42, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Ramzan Ali

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable people. Aftab1995 (talk) 17:52, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * After having searched the internet to see what the subject has been doing, I am not convinced that he meets notability requirements. Aftab1995 (talk) 16:32, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep There are two external link to Indian national newspapers having significant coverage of the subject . He might have published simultaneously into many others. I found some more,, , , , . I guess there are many more and sufficient enough to help the subject to reach WP:BLP standard. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  08:56, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If I remember correctly, this article meets WP:CSD criteria as very short article. Secondly, i don't understand how this article meets WP:BLP standart? because he is Limca Book of Records holder Or he try to holding Guinness Book of World Records for non-stop hair cutting? --Aftab1995 (talk) 16:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Nope. You are advised to review WP:CSD. I would quote CSD#A1 if you are concerned about, it says, Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. The subject of the article is identified. It voids here. If CSD#A3, it says, Any article consisting only of external links, category tags and "see also" sections... It voids as well. And not only BLP, but the subject satisfy GNG and NPEOPLE as well. And why? Because he has been published into multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources. A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject (see, WP:BASIC). And not only one event, following his coverage of Limca world records, he might have been published thereafter as well, for many other activies. He is the owner of "Ramzan's Hair Academy" (source). The Academy might have been published as well quoting him. The article requires expansion not deletion. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  17:25, 27 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep per guidelines. The subject meets WP:BIO.--Iniciativass (talk) 07:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.