Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramzan Utsiyev


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:37, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Ramzan Utsiyev

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about footballer who made a single appearance in a Russian Cup (football) match, and otherwise has only played in amateur or semi-pro football leagues. There is no significant coverage of this footballer (if you filter out articles on his famous older brother, Rizvan Utsiyev) in online English- or Russian-language sources (just database entries, match reports and transfer announcements, e.g., ). There is long-standing consensus that a nominal amount of play in a fully-pro league doesn't justify the presumption of notability in WP:NFOOTBALL when there is a comprehensive WP:GNG failure - as there is here. Jogurney (talk) 18:27, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:40, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:40, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:40, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 20:23, 29 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom; it is well established that scraping by on NFOOTBALL is insufficient when GNG is comprehensively failed. GiantSnowman 20:25, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete we clearly need to tighten our football notability guidelines. They are supposed to approximate people who will pass GNG, and at present they clearly are not.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:30, 30 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.