Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ran Neu-Ner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Creative Counsel.  Sandstein  18:12, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Ran Neu-Ner

 * – ( View AfD View log )

notability not established, sources are mostly unreliable and the rest are dead or not covering NeuNer. The only reputable source, CNBC, does not cover NeuNer himself, but simply quotes him. The other CNBC source is just a list of articles. The awards he received are not proof of notability. The Entrepreneur Magazine reference is dead. The Alumnus Profile reference is dead. Ysangkok (talk) 16:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 16:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 16:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 16:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 16:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 16:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 16:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 16:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Pinging who originally accepted this AfC draft.
 * Delete per nom  -- Devoke water   (talk)  16:19, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This is passing mentions at best. Absolutely insufficient material for a well-referenced BLP, failure to demonstrate notability - David Gerard (talk) 17:38, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * A quick Google News search gave references like this, this & this. The subject appears to be an authority in cryptocurrency domain and a prominent show host. I accepted it keeping in mind the 50/50 rule of AfC. Dial911 (talk) 17:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , thanks. I don't know if you're aware but there's not much love given by AfC to cryptocurrency-focused sources. Also, sources that start with https://www.forbes.com/sites/ are basically blogs and should not be confused with Forbes magazine. ~Kvng (talk) 18:13, 28 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect to The Creative Counsel as WP:ATD. ~Kvng (talk) 15:04, 27 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.