Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rana Shabbir Ahmad Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Xavexgoem (talk) 15:59, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Rana Shabbir Ahmad Khan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Seems not to meet WP:GNG. Sitush (talk) 14:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 25 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete No indication of wp:notability. Since it has no content, nothing would be lost if wp:notability were to be established at a later date and the articl4e restarted. North8000 (talk) 16:58, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. Being chairman of a bank with 357 branches, 5500 employees and a million customers is certainly an indication of notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:13, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Good point, but just clarifying, it is not refuting my point which was about indication of wp:notability in the article. North8000 (talk) 14:30, 2 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:V.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:37, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. How does this fail WP:V? The source in the article clearly verifies its content. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:13, 31 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. This article didn't have an AfD template until today, so this discussion needs to be relisted to allow a week's discussion. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:06, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Agree that it needs to be relisted but I am also sure that it did have the template. I always check because I use Twinkle and it can barf sometimes (never has for me, but I've seen people say this). Maybe some weird db glitch? - Sitush (talk) 21:24, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * This edit of yours removed the template. You probably still had a tab open with the previous version of the article and edited that rather than the then current version - I know I've been caught out like that several times. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:31, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Damn. That sounds possible. Sorry, folks. - Sitush (talk) 08:06, 2 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep on the basis of Phil Bridger's argument the CEOs of very large companies are notable, even if the information is hard to find for some geographic areas and might require print sources.  DGG ( talk ) 05:57, 2 February 2012 (UTC).
 * Chairman, not CEO. "Chairman" is often a titular rather than executive position in Pakistan. Furthermore, surely this is inheriting notability from the company? If there is an article about the bank itself then just redirect/merge this one to that. - Sitush (talk) 08:06, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Agree, and would add that that distinction is not peculiar to Pakistan.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:25, 10 February 2012 (UTC)


 * oops, my error--but the actual status would have to be determined. Sometimes the chairman is the CEO.  DGG ( talk ) 05:55, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * That's true. But it certainly isn't something I would assume.  In the absence of such a showing.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:28, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Wifione  Message 12:01, 2 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete or Merge with Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited. With so little detail I can't see this as a suitable independent article. A couple of sentences added to the article on the bank would cover the topic.  Tigerboy1966  22:08, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails to meet our notability guidelines.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:28, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.