Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randheer Rai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:54, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Randheer Rai

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Bit-part actor with no reliable independent sources. Guy (help!) 21:36, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:38, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:38, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - The article has no reliable sources. Some of them are plot summaries for the films he was in, and one of them is IMDB. Also, it is almost impossible to figure out what the article is about without rewriting it. Analog Horror, ( Speak ) 23:40, 25 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete The Person is well known in India, but references are not enough here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Litbeby (talk • contribs) 09:02, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: I don't know if there is a consensus regarding the reliability of Bombay Times; the two articles provided don't seem too bad, but do have a bit of an interview style about them. I found some additional sources:
 * →https://www.thehansindia.com/posts/index/Cinema/2019-01-05/Randheer-Rai-essaying-a-dark-role-in-Jiji-Maa/469627 – The Hans India
 * →https://www.mid-day.com/articles/tvs-randheer-rai-to-star-opposite-mahie-gill/21390185 – Mid-day.com; again, I don't know if there is a consensus for this news outlet
 * →https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/jiji-maa-actor-randheer-rai-blessed-with-a-baby-girl/articleshow/70095077.cms – Times of India; while we now need to be more careful with Times of India articles, there doesn't seem anything inherently problematic with this one; the topic of the article (the birth of the subject's child) is a little frivolous, but it does also mention some of the subject's work
 * While this coverage might not be enough to meet WP:GNG, it's certainly getting close, I think. As for WP:NACTOR, I wouldn't describe the subject as a bit-part actor, as he has had supporting roles in a number of films and TV shows, which I think is enough to get him over the line. I agree with the comment above that the page itself needs to be cleaned up, and I am happy to do that (if the article remains). Dflaw4 (talk) 04:30, 28 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete because the subject does not meet WP:NACTOR.-- KartikeyaS (talk) 05:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:57, 2 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.