Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randi Ettner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:16, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Randi Ettner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete (from nominator). No evidence of WP:PROF or WP:GNG. "Energy psychology"? Really? The only thing I can find which comes close to meeting notability is publishing books. However, I can find no evidence of any of the books getting any kinds of review/notice in any big place. Just blogs. Barcaboy2 (talk) 14:40, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete, not notable enough and reads like a CV. Kierzek (talk) 18:48, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk  11:05, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. As per above, non-notable.— James Cantor (talk) 14:49, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.