Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randolph Southern Junior-Senior High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:08, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Randolph Southern Junior-Senior High School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No apparent notability or references available to be cited. &#124; Naypta✉ opened his mouth at 12:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

While I understand that the page (and Union City HS) may be deleted, if you look back through my history, I am systematically going through every high school in Indiana and either updating it or doing routine page maintenance. I personally believe it's up to the students / faculty / citizens of that area to fill in the information for that school, as they're more familiar with it. There should be a suitable timeframe given before nominating something for deletion especially as the article was made in good-faith - to include an Infobox.ZCash1104 (talk) 12:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi. Articles for deletion discussions are usually not concluded for a week or longer, so you have plenty of time to add more information to the article if you think it can be brought up to Wikipedia's standards. Cheers, Iago Qnsi  (talk) 14:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: Providing there is some independent evidence that the school exists, WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES suggests that this should be considered to be notable. JMWt (talk) 14:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Hey good to know. I just checked out the School Outcomes page you put on there. Just noting that I do put the school's website on each page created, so hopefully that is at least one independent article to verify its existence. Thanks for the information! :) ZCash1104 (talk) 14:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * you may need to think a bit clearer about what an "independent secondary source" means, because (fairly obviously, when you think about it), a website written by the school is not independent or secondary as per WP:RS. If the only source that exists suggesting that the school exists is written by the school itself, that's not good enough. JMWt (talk) 14:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * This is an independent secondary source. There is likely others (including, for example, official government documents). JMWt (talk) 14:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep per SCHOOLOUTCOMES. It is listed in the Indiana Department of Education website. (Click Randolph County in the map [middle of the eastern boundary], and then on Randolph Southern School Corp.) Clarityfiend (talk) 02:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - appears to fail WP:GNG. There is coverage, but it appears to be local and routine. Note that WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES is an essay summarising common outcomes of AfD discussions, not a policy or guideline. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Secondary schools have long been kept on bare existence rather than GNG. This is due to Wikipedia's gazetteer function. Schools are considered features of the landscape, much like roads and settlements. Indeed, the US Government recognizes this school as such: . It is listed in the NCES database. And finally, it is listed here on the Indiana High School Athletic Association website. Although, contrary to the opinion expressed above, all that is needed is the school's website to prove existence. It exists. We will have an article on it. John from Idegon (talk) 12:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * While it is true that secondary schools have generally been kept,, that consensus might be breaking down. See Articles for deletion/Good Shepherd English School, which was recently closed as delete. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Editors might be interested to discuss whether WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES should be considered to be consensus at this RfC given that this has been brought up here. JMWt (talk) 13:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Wrongly, since it was clearly a no consensus result. I have asked the closer to change his mind. If not I shall take it to DRV. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES which applies until it doesn't (i.e., until consensus has changed). VMS Mosaic (talk) 10:12, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:42, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:42, 30 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per longstanding consensus at AfD that high schools of confirmed existence are notable per se like hamlets, rivers, highways, mountains, and professional athletes. Carrite (talk) 04:55, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - per the past bazillion AfDs on this subject. As I just did to Union City Community High School, I encourage someone to improve the article as well.--Milowent • hasspoken  18:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.