Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Eastwood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:20, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Randy Eastwood

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Eastwood lost his race for US Congress. Being mayor of Kenmore, Washington, which is his other close claim to notability is just not enough to establish his notability. The sources are not what we would need to establish notability for this level of apolitician. John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:15, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 16:20, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 16:20, 25 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete — Per nom, or put another way: all coverage of subject is ROUTINE. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:47, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Instaurare (talk) 23:45, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-winning candidates for political office do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates; if you cannot credibly claim and reliably source that he was already eligible for a Wikipedia article for some other reason independent of his candidacy, then he has to win the seat, not just run for it, to become eligible because of his political activity itself. But this does not demonstrate any reason at all why he would be eligible for an article. Bearcat (talk) 14:28, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - coverage is broad but shallow. Bearian (talk) 00:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not an easy call, but I am convinced that he doesn't meet the threshold required by WP:POLITICIAN.  → Call me  Razr   Nation  11:10, 1 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.