Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rangsinobhadol Yugala


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR applies. ✗ plicit  10:40, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Rangsinobhadol Yugala

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I can’t read Thai so there may be sources I can’t access but the th.wiki version of this article is sourced to official court circulars about status and title. That doesn’t equate to in-depth coverage in multiple reliable independent sources and it’s not our job to document every minor member of royal families, Mccapra (talk) 05:12, 4 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:34, 11 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:40, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Royalty and nobility,  and Thailand. Mccapra (talk) 05:12, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. There's considerable coverage on her death (with brief obituaries) in the traditional news sites (Daily News, Matichon, Voice TV, Khao Sod), but most of them are based on her son's announcement Facebook post and information available online (with some citing the Thai Wikipedia). As is usual, the daily royal news piece provided by the National News Bureau about the royal attendance of her funeral by Princess Soamsawali includes an obituary covering the subject's life. It's rather unfortunate that reporters these days rely on Wikipedia for information, but the subject is the sort of person whose death would have generated the same news coverage anyway. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:45, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.