Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rangubai Junnare English Medium School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  No consensus (default keep). Merging seems to be the most reasonable outcome, which at least in part has already been attempted by TerriersFan. Completion of this effort and redirection can be handled outside of AfD, and does not require anything to be deleted.  Jerry  talk ¤ count/logs 01:02, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Rangubai Junnare English Medium School

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Page was 95% copyrighted material taken from here, which has now been removed. Remainder doesn't include references. As per the suggestions in WP:SCHOOLS, middle schools are generally not notable without coverage from secondary sources. justinfr (talk) 17:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. What's left looks like poorly written spam, and middle schools are not notable by default. RayAYang (talk) 17:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:33, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:33, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Nashik, making an education section as needed. Notability isn't claimed for the school; when that's the case, merge/redirect is how this is typically handled.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  20:34, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect: no real content to merge, just spam. CRGreathouse (t | c) 16:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Nashik where I have added relevant content. TerriersFan (talk) 21:15, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Possible keep --Nasik is a major city of India. English Medium education is the route to well-paid employment.  The material deleted as copy-vio suggests that it is a notable school.  The problem is with the present lack of content.  I have just added a category to it (as it had none), but it may be the wrong one, an insufficiently detailed one.  Peterkingiron (talk) 23:11, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep under the assumption that it is a secondary school. They are all in practice considered notable, but some real sources should be found and added. DGG (talk) 07:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.