Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rania Khalek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No consensus was derived from this discussion. Nakon 04:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Rania Khalek

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no secondary RS coverage of this person. Having written op-eds of unknown notability for a few left-wing outlets does not make one notable. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 12:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Actually there are plenty of sources that have her as a direct subject, such as the Jerusalem Post, but none are cited in the article.69.254.118.137 (talk) 17:48, 26 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 16:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 16:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 16:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:50, 5 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Lots of sources just not in article at present.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I read the first two pages of results. There are only two RS on those pages: (1) a long Daily Beast story that mentions Khalek briefly in two sentences (2) A Dagens Nyheter article which covers the Daily Beast article and mentions Khalek once. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 21:41, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Sources include this interview on her, in-depth story about her, and major coverage of her in Commentary magazine. She's often a subject of controversy also here, so in addition to her credentials as a journalist and podcaster, she easily meets the general notability guideline.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.