Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rank of Commercial-Business Passenger airplanes manufacturer Companies By Production Approx Passenger Capacity Range


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:52, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Rank of Commercial-Business Passenger airplanes manufacturer Companies By Production Approx Passenger Capacity Range

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

We only seem to have massive lists like List of aircraft manufacturers B-C, which isn't sortable. This new list is, but I can't help but think "Commercial-Business Passenger airplanes manufacturer Companies By Production Approx Passenger Capacity Range" is a fairly incomprehensible and WP:Indiscriminate concept for a standalone list. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:44, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:44, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:44, 19 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete This isn't indiscriminate, it's a non-encyclopedic cross categorization, or OVERLY discriminate, in other words. Jclemens (talk) 04:48, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I PRODded this just a few minutes before the AfD was opened, with the comment "Incoherent and arbitrary unreferenced comparison list with no clear purpose." Someone has since shovelled some incoherent text into the Lead, presumably to give some indication of purpose, but it all remains rather pointless. There isn't even the kernel of an encyclopaedia article in this. I'd better stop before I start sounding rude. YSSYguy (talk) 12:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - totally incomprehensible article. If it were translated into English it would be non-encyclopedic. - Ahunt (talk) 13:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per Ahunt. Whatever it's actual point, in can be, and probably is, better covered elsewhere, and in intelligible English. - BilCat (talk) 03:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete As a poorly sourced list filled with WP:OR and non-encyclopedic.  Omni Flames  ( talk ) 06:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the above. &mdash; Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 12:51, 24 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.