Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ransomware


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 02:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Ransomware

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

As the author of http://www.jrandom.com/ransomware.html, I'm flattered by the attention but I don't believe this neologism has achieved notability, even in relation to Ransomware (malware). Schneier's Street Performer Protocol is a fine substitute. Erik Seaberg 05:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I remember seeing a few people who coined a neologism argue in favor of deleting it but I don't think I've ever seen someone go to AfD with one himself - impressive. As far as notability is concerned, I think I even remember Bruce or PRZ using the term (ie. in this context, not in the other) once but neither a Google search nor a search of my mailing list archives resulted in any relevant hits. I suppose it could have been a Usenet posting (yeah, X-No-Archive does have its drawbacks too) but the bottom line is that I couldn't find much in terms of reliable sources. Hence, I vote delete even though I think it's an interesting article. -- Seed 2.0 12:13, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Seed's eloquent consideration. The article even says that it's a "notion", and as anyone reading Schneier or Scoble or anyone in their circles is exposed to scores of "notions" every year, I would really have to see some sources that this was a notable or influential one. --Dhartung | Talk 08:37, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.