Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranya Rao


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 10:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Ranya Rao

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

1 supporting role, 2 roles in films not yet released. I do not consider this even a claim to notability, but the CSD was declined.  DGG ( talk ) 22:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    23:28, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    23:28, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    23:28, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as the current information which cites 3 films is not suggesting better notability and improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  23:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:47, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Hoping for better insight with this, I'm notifying Indian users, , , and .  SwisterTwister   talk  04:29, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - While I agree that she hasn't acted in many features, she seems to have received good enough coverage -    . Her performance in her debut film also received good reception -   . Apart from these sources, her upcoming film, in which she has the lead role, is apparently a big deal in the Tamil cinema. Online coverage of South Indian cinema is generally pretty scarse and having received coverage from various notable sources, this satisfies WP:BASIC and WP:GNG.   Ya  sh  !   05:08, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Yash! extremely useful post. Thanks! --MurderByDeadcopy"bang!" 06:22, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NACTOR. It's ok that she got press coverage but lets not forget the basics (following) of NACTOR.
 * Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.
 * Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.
 * Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.
 * She does not qualify for any of the above three criteria. We should not get excited by just seeing mention in a newspapers; these days few drinks in a nice bar buys people an article in leading daily newspapers in India. WP:TOOSOON. Thanks for the ping SwisterTwister . Arun Kumar SINGH  (Talk)  10:21, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * To establish notability of any subject, it does not necessarily have to meet WP:NACTOR as long as it meets WP:BASIC. BASIC states: People who meet the basic criteria may be considered notable without meeting the additional criteria below (including NACTOR). The comments about getting article into leading newspapers over a few drinks is purely subjective and your personal point of view.  Ya  sh  !   10:34, 26 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep: Passes WP:GNG as shown by Yash. -- Human 3015   TALK   11:19, 26 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.