Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranz Kyle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. due to persistent lack of participation. A third relist would not be appropriate. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:19, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Ranz Kyle

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No assertion of notability whatsoever. Kbabej (talk) 04:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 04:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 04:39, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Fails WP:ENT. Should have been WP:CSD. -- Gpkp  [ u • t • c ] 07:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Totally not notable  Java  Hurricane  16:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete definitely fails to meet WP:GNG. Abishe (talk) 03:12, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: I found some reliable sources about him:, , , , , , and . He and his sister were among the nominees of a certain category in 2019 Nickelodeon Kids' Choice Awards. The article needs a lot of clean-up. Other than that, it's good enough to pass WP:ENT.  ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 12:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1 isn't reliable IMO. 2 is an interview. 3 is not significant coverage but more like a puff piece just listing some videos. Can't judge reliability of 4 due to language barrier. 5 is WP:MILL and not sigcov. 6 doesn't look like sigcov. 7 is not sigcov, doesn't discuss in detail. 8 is not a reliable source in my experience and also looks a bit like a puff piece/video listing, again.  Java Hurricane  08:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable dancer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:08, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename to Ranz and Niana. Meets WP:ENT with sources presented by Astig. The duo seem notable, but not as individuals as per WP:INHERIT. SBKSPP (talk) 03:14, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 15:18, 9 March 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 10:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.